blog.stoneybrookite.org

the best friends you’ll never have

Having just started a small fire in my kitchen while cooking rice, now seems like as good a time as any to stop my hiatus and return to posting here.

I have also been more absent than usual from my regular BSC-related internet activities, but not so absent that a shift in the fandom has passed me by. It’s a small shift, to be sure, barely perceptible except to those who have been around for a while and pay close attention. It used to be that I, born in 1986, was at the young end of the BSC fan spectrum. Perhaps this is just a natural part of life, that you used to be the baby and now you feel like a seasoned old-timer who should be retiring to Florida within the next couple of years, but now I can name a handful of people in the fandom, who are active and post on the boards and on the lj and on ff.net (illegally!) who were born in 1997. 1997!!!! In 1997 I was revelling in my angst and listening to silverchair! And of course, reading new BSC books, although I was already embarassed to be seen buying them in the bookstore.

And now we have new readers of the BSC, for whom the fashions of the late eighties and early 90s are as difficult to understand as the sanitary belt of the unupdated Are You There God, It’s Me, Margaret was for our generation. But something still resonates with them, and they build their collections secondhand, not lucky enough to have been around when you could count on a new regular series every month, a new Mystery every other month, and a Super Special in the summer. They come online and discuss the books with us, bringing their currently-happening middle school experiences to the table.

I have long been a cynic when it comes to the question of reissuing the books or Ann writing a reunion book. A reunion book is something I just plain don’t really want, but a new print run I have always thought to be not particularly financially viable. The BSC was a huge series, and it’s just not conceivable that it would sell as well as it did at its peak to make printing them justifiable. And true, the graphic novels did not sell well enough to merit extending the series beyond the planned four books. But some kids aren’t into graphic novels, even though the BSC ones are awesome and I adore them. My sister, who is eight, didn’t want the graphic novels, but she wanted my regular books. I gave her my doubles, along with some other childhood favorites, and my dad said she “really loved the books,” so perhaps I have created another young BSC fan.


Maybe I was wrong. Maybe the BSC books would do well, well enough at least to republish the first 25 or so books. But one thing: no updating, like SVH. I think part of what makes BSC so popular is that it is from a relatively simpler time, without cell phones and before the internet had really taken hold. I liked books from before my time as a kid for this very reason. I loved reading about life in the early 1960s on the Upper West Side almost as much as I liked reading about Harriet M. Welsch herself. So please Scholastic, if you do rerelease the books, don’t trade in the Junk Bucket for a unnamed used Honda Civic, like what happened with poor 1BRUCE1.

14 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
mizzmarvel said, June 23rd, 2008 at 2:19 pm

I reeeeeeeally don’t want a BSC reunion book, even if it would be financially viable. There’d be so much build up in fandom that it’d be destined to be a disappointment.

mygif
Jenn said, June 23rd, 2008 at 4:34 pm

I don’t want a reunion book, either. I like thinking of them stuck in a perpetual time loop, with so much potential and their lives ahead of them. There’d be so much disappointment with having a “definitive” answer to what/where they ended up.

I have to say that I’m getting increasingly more frustrated with the younger members posting in various places, mostly with the way they post. There’s a whole culture that was established Even though I haven’t been around this fandom long, it was pretty clear when I first showed up what the rules of etiquette are and how you should post. But these kids barely string together sentences and are all over the place in terms of content. It’s annoying. (Get off my lawn! hee.)

mygif_alt
Penny said, June 23rd, 2008 at 4:56 pm

I agree with everything you just said. And with everything Jenn just said.

As for the Reunion book, I do want one, but I don’t at the same time. I think it would be interesting to see where Ann would put the girls,but at the same time I fear where/how she might have them end up.

mygif
bbb said, June 23rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm

I’m glad you said that, Jenn, I was beginning to think I was a bad person for getting frustrated with the younger posters as well :/ I don’t mind when new, young people come on board, of course they are welcome. But when the content of what they post is basically incoherent or when they post just to increase their post count, well, it sort of gets to me. Also, it just really surprises me that people as young as 11, 12, 13 read the BSC today.

mygif_alt
dsharpe113 said, June 24th, 2008 at 12:39 am

I kind of WANT a reunion book… if anything else so we find out what really happened to all the characters. Right now it’s anyone’s guess.
But I agree that it probably wouldnt’ live up to expectations…but I’d still like to see one :|
Then again, I’m just a sucker :)

mygif
Myu said, June 24th, 2008 at 10:22 am

I’m of the same opinion regarding a reunion book and a reprint. I can’t imagine being satisfied with any reunion book - having all the girls end up married with 2.4 children would bore me; having them all lose touch would be a bit sad (albeit realistic).

I noticed and know exactly what you mean about feeling old among the BSC fans now - I was born in 86 too and dread picking up “Stacey’s Big Crush” as I am now the same age as Wes.

mygif_alt
Ashley said, June 24th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

I am so against a reunion book, it’s not even funny, lol. As much as I love the BSC, just .. NO. I prefer to be able to give them my own futures in my head, or in fanfics, or through RPGs. I don’t want another Harry Potter epilogue. BARF.

Though I am all for a series reprint, with flashy new covers. I’d love to be able to buy the books for my collection every month at the bookstore again. And I agree, no updating, though I would like the minor inconsistencies fixed up, like the “now-we’re-sisters present” fiasco of books 30-31, and any other things that have been pointed out millions of times: name errors, Mary Anne’s mom mom-sitting Stacey’s mom, etc. etc.

mygif
rebecca said, June 24th, 2008 at 6:59 pm

I’m on the older end of BSC fans (I started reading when book #5 was first published, although I was young to be reading chapter books at the time) so imagine how I feel!

But anyway, I don’t think the books could be reprinted, not even if they were updated. It’s not the out of date references that are the problem, either, in my opinion. Young adult, and even middle grade, fiction these days is very… dramatic. It’s also pretty gritty. You have to be willing to really tackle tough issues and not balk at having characters talk the way real kids and teenagers talk, rather than using your characters to set positive examples. And AMM just didn’t do that with the BSC. They’re too squeaky clean and well rounded, with good, easy lives. It’s not the clothes or the lack of cell phones and email that date these books (although frankly, I don’t think such a club could exist now, in the age of online services), it’s the style of the writing. And that’s not a quick fix–that would necessitate a whole new series.

mygif_alt
thejunkbucket said, June 25th, 2008 at 8:59 pm

“I was born in 86 too and dread picking up “Stacey’s Big Crush” as I am now the same age as Wes”

I just laughed out loud at that! I am approximately the same age, and that comment just made me feel sooo old.

Regarding the reunion book - I would read it, but I agree it’s just so much more fun to guess at the girls’ futures.

Regarding updating the errors - For some reason, I like the errors. They have led to a lot of laughs in these kinds of communities, and as much as I love BSC books, it’s just so much fun to laugh at them.

mygif
Laura @ hungryandfrozen said, June 25th, 2008 at 9:29 pm

Greer - I was born in 86 and angst-ed to silverchair (oh the shame) too :)

I had no idea there were younger fans. I love re-reading the books because they are of simpler times…I wonder how young kids can relate to that. A reprint would be pointless, they already flashily reprinted everything anyway! I personally LOVE finding the old, original covers in second-hand shops…they are more loveable than the bright reprinted ones. And a reunion…eh. Let them be - I agree with Jenn.

mygif_alt
Ashley said, June 26th, 2008 at 2:11 am

There is no shame in angsting to Silverchair, it happened to the best of us. (Speaking of, I haven’t listened to them in awhile. I think I will!)

mygif
corduroy said, June 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

I’m another person who started reading the series when the books were just beginning to be published. I remember the excitement I felt when a new BSC came out…in some ways I’m a bit envious of readers who picked up the series later in its run, because waiting for the next installment wasn’t such an issue-they had more adventures to read or reread until the next book came out.

mygif_alt
Kylie90210 said, July 9th, 2008 at 9:50 pm

I’m another 1986 baby, and I agree about the younger generation. It’s fantastic they are reading BSC, my 10 year old cousin is apparently really wanting to (I might buy a box of eBay and send it to her), but the online stuff tends to bug me. I guess it is because I am used to adult conversation and sentence structuring on BSC/SV forums, and it annoys me I have to try and make out what is being said, kinda like some HP forums.

mygif
tinypants said, August 21st, 2008 at 11:04 pm

“And now we have new readers of the BSC, for whom the fashions of the late eighties and early 90s are as difficult to understand as the sanitary belt of the unupdated Are You There God, It’s Me, Margaret was for our generation.”

This isn’t exactly a compelling comment, but that sentence made my day! Man, I read that book when I was eight years old (which was in 1988) and it confused me to no end.

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comment