blog.stoneybrookite.org

the best friends you’ll never have

You could make a lot of points about Twilight and why it sucks. You could focus on the use of words like “chagrin” and “dazzle.” You could talk about the series as “abstinence porn,” or raise the question of Edward Cullen as an abusive control-freak. None of these things really bother me, though. I can overlook all of it for the unadulterated DAZZLE.

Something was bothering me, though. It bothered me when I read an excerpt of Stephenie Meyer’s Vogue profile, thinking the whole time, “Why the hell is this woman in Vogue? Oh well, at least it’s not a Plum Sykes feature.” There was something nagging me about the whole Twilight phenomenon, something that was just… off.

It only became clear when I somehow ended up at the Forks, WA website. There is a interactive map feature, where you can look at all kinds of different places in Forks which are featured in the book. Like the Thriftway.

I was kind of surprised when the map came to La Push, though. I had always assumed, for some reason, that the Quileutes were not a real tribe, because I would imagine that they wouldn’t appreciate their culture being co-opted to create a mythology of werewolf vampire killers for a series of books for teenage girls. But La Push is real, and First Beach is real, and their website makes no mention of the Twilight connection. (Although I guess on the bright side, they’ve raked in a lot of money from increased tourism.) Even the stores and restaurants that Bella goes to in Port Angeles are real places.

In fact, if you want, you can participate in a six day, five night trip to Volterra, which luckily includes wine tasting. I shudder to think how much wine it would require to make me forget that I spent 2299$ on a Twilight tour in Italy.

It seems strange that Stephenie Meyer didn’t make up any locations for her books except for, I am assuming, the houses of the characters. Isn’t part of the fun of writing fiction is that you can make up your own locations, settings, and objects and manipulate them to suit the story? It reminds me of Mallory Pike in Mallory Pike, #1 Fan, where she thinks that fiction must be truth and have a counterpart in life. No, that’s why it’s FICTION. If you want to give a Cullen a fast car, you don’t need to consult someone on a year, make, and model number, unless you’re searching for an endorsement deal. You can make up your own goddamn superfast car.

In the series, Stephenie Meyer failed to create her own mythology, the way JK Rowling did or even Ann M. Martin and Francine Pascal. Stephenie Meyer couldn’t even be bothered to think up something as basic as The Dairi Burger. It seems like a strange decision to have to set everything in real places. If you want to set a story in New York City or Paris or another big city which already has a mythology in the collective consciousness, that makes sense. It’s a specific decision that is made to convey a ready-made meaning. But to set your series in a small remote town which no one has ever heard of–well, it wouldn’t make a difference whether Forks was real or not, because it doesn’t already have a meaning attached to it for 99.9% of the people in this world. She could have made up her own town on the Olympic Peninsula and given it stores and other locations as she saw fit.

It’s decisions like these which really mark Stephenie Meyer as an amateur, I think. It shows that she didn’t have the self-confidence to create an entire world for her stories. Now, I thought some of the things she did make up, like the Vampire Wars of the South, were pretty interesting. So I’m just not sure what her problem was and why she decided to hold herself to the Mallory Pike Rules of Fiction as Inspired By a Made-up Ernest Hemingway Quote.

10 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
Laura @ Hungry and Frozen said, March 3rd, 2009 at 12:33 am

That is a really good point. And I love how so many things in life can be related back and explained through the Baby Sitters Club :)

mygif
greer said, March 3rd, 2009 at 12:52 am

The BSC’s influence in our lives and thinking can never be underestimated. Probably because so many of us read a BSC book a day for a good chunk of our childhoods.

mygif_alt
nikki said, March 3rd, 2009 at 8:47 am

LOL…six degrees of BSC.

mygif
Abby said, March 3rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

I hate Twilight and Stephenie Meyer for all the reasons in your first paragraph, but have to say her using real places doesn’t really bother me. I actually think it’s cool, particularly if I’m from the area the authors are describing.

I actually got sick of reading about the ‘Sweet Valley Pharmacy’ and the ‘Sweet Valley Nursery School’ and the other generic places Francine couldn’t bother to name herself so slapped Sweet Valley on it. I would have welcomed a Walgreens or New Horizon mention just to break it up.

mygif_alt
greer said, March 3rd, 2009 at 3:30 pm

@abby: I’ve never read Sweet Valley. Ann didn’t resort to naming everything “Stoneybrook X,” though.

I’m sure that it’s either thrilling or extremely annoying for the 3,000 people who live in the town.

mygif
Sadako said, March 3rd, 2009 at 4:03 pm

To be fair, the BSC did go to real places at least some of the time. Like Stamford, or, of course, New York. Though they never went to actual plays (it was always something like Paris Magic) and a lot of the restaurants were made up (the Lion’s Lair?).

mygif_alt
greer said, March 3rd, 2009 at 5:26 pm

@Sadako:

If you want to set a story in New York City or Paris or another big city which already has a mythology in the collective consciousness, that makes sense. It’s a specific decision that is made to convey a ready-made meaning.

mygif
Taren said, March 4th, 2009 at 6:54 am

You’re made of win. You know this, yes? I do have one correction though -she DOES have to know the make and model number because there are crazy ass rabid fans who HAVE to know these things and would bug her to death about it with emails and stuff, so putting it in takes the place of answering all those messages.

All I have to say is be careful when you criticize Twilight. I did (or rather, I criticized the fans) after the whole Stephen King thing and some Twilight fan site found it and posted it in its entirety on their site. I commented, because I wanted to be nice and thank them for thinking my post was comment worthy. Then I expressed reservations about the whole thing being posted there, since I don’t know about copyright and rules and all that and they went APESHIT and totally misunderstood my intent. Someone said something about defending Twilight til the death….oi vey..

mygif_alt
greer said, March 4th, 2009 at 9:04 pm

@Taren: thank you! Actually, I feel like Stephenie Meyer is a rabid fan of herself. Yesterday, during a discussion with my friends, I decided that twilight really was just Stephenie Meyer’s 2,000 page spankbank. A physical description of Bella she gave in some interview matches perfectly with a description of a hotter SM.

I’m not scared of the Twitards, though.

mygif
Lyman said, March 7th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

^ Hahaha, that explains a lot. I don’t really understand Stephanie Meyer’s intent there in using real locations, unless she was specifically thinking about the possibilities of fan travel, which was probably not the case..Maybe she couldn’t be bothered to make up her own locations, because she seems more interested in writing about teh vampirez sex than in developing a universe/mythology (or plot..or compelling characters..), and it shows. Of course, the whole point of Twilight is that there isn’t any sex. What a deal.

Also, I didn’t know that the Hemingway quote was fake! wtf ghostwriter.

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comment